Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 20:56:47 GMT -8
A lot. Actually, a lot. No, I correct myself, those posts are based only on fluff , on absolute nothingness, on total emptiness. They are articles that all look a little alike, they seem to be made with a mould. You read one and you've read the others too. Those blogs remind me of the hucksters, the street vendors of the past who went around with their bandwagon to sell you a miracle medicine. If we read them carefully - without believing what they say - we can discover within them some techniques that work, that appeal to the masses. You can refute me as you want, or rather do it in the comments, but I see that all these posts have the same structures and characteristics. The “you” technique To make more impact on the reader . Because the "you" brings you closer than the "you"; it's as if that post was addressed only and directly to the reader, to you who read.
If you want to convince someone to buy something from you, then use “you”. The technique of very short paragraphs Which I can't stand. Americans also have this habit. Many often use one-sentence or even one-word paragraphs. Ok that we need to use short paragraphs and not 48 lines, but let's not exaggerate. However, in my opinion, this method allows the reader to be very curious, it makes the words stand out better on the page , capturing attention. The hooking technique Do you really want to stop Special Data working? Are you tired of going to the office? Do you want to afford a month's vacation? A barrage of questions , which attract and catch the gullible person on duty. Those posts are full of hooks like this. They ask the right questions to the right person. Those questions can only have one answer, we all know it, and the bloggers who ask them know it. The redundancy technique Repetita iuvant . Repeat, repeat, repeat. What? The same concepts over and over again.
Change a few words, but I noticed that those posts only repeat the same thought to make it imprint well in the reader's mind . Some kind of brainwashing? If it's not, it's pretty close. The technique of real examples Perhaps the best technique. Because it makes the post seem credible. The reader reads true stories , real experiences of someone who was successful and made money, but those with a capital S. There is a problem, however. Success is personal and above all it is for a few. Indeed, for very few. We can follow the steps indicated in those posts as much as we want - or rather, the "steps" - but success is not something that can be achieved thanks to a tutorial. The urgency technique The tone of voice is urgent . He leaves us no escape, we have to hurry - to do what we don't know well - otherwise we will miss the opportunity. Throughout the text we feel this urgency in the writing , and perhaps it is in this case that we can trace the post-fluff to those advertisements in which the seller shouts at the top of his lungs to convince us to buy a diamond ring for 39.99 euros, before the offer expires.
If you want to convince someone to buy something from you, then use “you”. The technique of very short paragraphs Which I can't stand. Americans also have this habit. Many often use one-sentence or even one-word paragraphs. Ok that we need to use short paragraphs and not 48 lines, but let's not exaggerate. However, in my opinion, this method allows the reader to be very curious, it makes the words stand out better on the page , capturing attention. The hooking technique Do you really want to stop Special Data working? Are you tired of going to the office? Do you want to afford a month's vacation? A barrage of questions , which attract and catch the gullible person on duty. Those posts are full of hooks like this. They ask the right questions to the right person. Those questions can only have one answer, we all know it, and the bloggers who ask them know it. The redundancy technique Repetita iuvant . Repeat, repeat, repeat. What? The same concepts over and over again.
Change a few words, but I noticed that those posts only repeat the same thought to make it imprint well in the reader's mind . Some kind of brainwashing? If it's not, it's pretty close. The technique of real examples Perhaps the best technique. Because it makes the post seem credible. The reader reads true stories , real experiences of someone who was successful and made money, but those with a capital S. There is a problem, however. Success is personal and above all it is for a few. Indeed, for very few. We can follow the steps indicated in those posts as much as we want - or rather, the "steps" - but success is not something that can be achieved thanks to a tutorial. The urgency technique The tone of voice is urgent . He leaves us no escape, we have to hurry - to do what we don't know well - otherwise we will miss the opportunity. Throughout the text we feel this urgency in the writing , and perhaps it is in this case that we can trace the post-fluff to those advertisements in which the seller shouts at the top of his lungs to convince us to buy a diamond ring for 39.99 euros, before the offer expires.